Consistency of decision criteria
consistency of evaluation criteria
One person said, "
In the past, I decided that B should be preferred over A with evaluation criteria as X. Now, I have decided that B should be preferred over A with evaluation criteria as X.
Now, if X is the criterion, then D should take precedence over C, but it seems to me that C should take precedence.
But there is no consistency. I don't know if this is the right thing to do.
I was struggling with the idea.
Good.
https://gyazo.com/8ce3bf9b8ff3b33c17632488404b2d8c
It was a mistake to verbalize "X is the criterion" in T1 during the previous decision-making process.
They were unaware that there was another axis, Y.
He finally realized this when he saw a case where the difference in X was not so great and the difference in Y was large.
It is important to realize the mistake.
Mistakes should be corrected.
err and not change one's ways, this is what it is to err
Mistakes in decision-making and Mistakes in the language of decision-making methods are two different things.
Rules of unknown value should be discarded.
Mistakes in the language of methods
Linguistic Mistakes
decision-making
Language of Methods Language of Methodology
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/判断基準の一貫性 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.